1. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most important and radical political activists of the 20th century. Not “civil rights figures.” Not “African American leaders.” Not “non-violent reformists.” When I say “radical political activist,” that is exactly what I mean. The scope of his vision for a better world was wide in breadth and deep in root. In his 13 short years of public activism, he (and his many allies) courageously addressed issues of race, class, materialism, war, moral culture, sex, and religion. The medicine Dr. King prescribed for each of these interrelated topics was bitter and centered around a “radical revolution of values“ (video here).
On this blog, I’ve noted modern culture’s attempt to retroactively “speak for” and water down Dr. King’s truly radical politics several times. This impulse to memorialize and canonize Dr. King and his ideas is so strong, you might think we as a people had actually consummated his vision for a better America. Sadly, I suspect the true reason to be much more banal; that is, we memorialize because “it is easier to build monuments than to make a better world.”
Well. Today is once again Martin Luther King Jr. Day and I thought I’d use the occasion for a somewhat novel purpose. Instead of focusing on the richness of Dr. King’s activism, I’d like to share a singular example of how this nation’s federal government thanked him for his efforts at peaceful democratic change. The following is from the excellent website “Letters of Note.”
In November of 1964, fearful of his connection to the Communist Partythrough Stanley Levison, the FBI anonymously sent Martin Luther King the following threatening letter, along with a cassette that contained allegedly incriminating audio recordings of King with women in various hotel rooms — the fruits of a 9 month surveillance project headed by William C. Sullivan.Unsurprisingly, King saw the strongly worded letter as an invitation for him to take his own life, as did an official investigation in 1976 which concluded that the letter “clearly implied that suicide would be a suitable course of action for Dr. King.”Transcript follows, free of most redactions.







KING,In view of your low grade… I will not dignify your name with either a Mr. or a Reverend or a Dr. And, your last name calls to mind only the type of King such as King Henry the VIII… King, look into your heart. You know you are a complete fraud and a great liability to all of us Negroes. White people in this country have enough frauds of their own but I am sure they don’t have one at this time anywhere near your equal. You are no clergyman and you know it. I repeat you are a colossal fraud and an evil, vicious one at that. You could not believe in God… Clearly you don’t believe in any personal moral principles. King, like all frauds your end is approaching. You could have been our greatest leader. You, even at an early age have turned out to be not a leader but a dissolute, abnormal moral imbecile. We will now have to depend on our older leaders like Wilkins, a man of character and thank God we have others like him. But you are done. Your “honorary” degrees, your Nobel Prize (what a grim farce) and other awards will not save you. King, I repeat you are done. No person can overcome facts, not even a fraud like yourself… I repeat — no person can argue successfully against facts… Satan could not do more. What incredible evilness… King you are done. The American public, the church organizations that have been helping — Protestant, Catholic and Jews will know you for what you are — an evil, abnormal beast. So will others who have backed you. You are done. King, there is only one thing left for you to do. You know what it is. You have just 34 days in which to do it (this exact number has been selected for a specific reason, it has definite practical significance). You are done. There is but one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy, abnormal fraudulent self is bared to the nation.







Dr. King was not perfect, no man can be; but he was brave and righteous, which few even attempt. Let’s take this moment to remember not only his beautiful vision for the way-the-world-could-be, but also the wretched way the world-as-it-was thanked him for his efforts.  Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most important and radical political activists of the 20th century. Not “civil rights figures.” Not “African American leaders.” Not “non-violent reformists.” When I say “radical political activist,” that is exactly what I mean. The scope of his vision for a better world was wide in breadth and deep in root. In his 13 short years of public activism, he (and his many allies) courageously addressed issues of race, class, materialism, war, moral culture, sex, and religion. The medicine Dr. King prescribed for each of these interrelated topics was bitter and centered around a “radical revolution of values“ (video here).
On this blog, I’ve noted modern culture’s attempt to retroactively “speak for” and water down Dr. King’s truly radical politics several times. This impulse to memorialize and canonize Dr. King and his ideas is so strong, you might think we as a people had actually consummated his vision for a better America. Sadly, I suspect the true reason to be much more banal; that is, we memorialize because “it is easier to build monuments than to make a better world.”
Well. Today is once again Martin Luther King Jr. Day and I thought I’d use the occasion for a somewhat novel purpose. Instead of focusing on the richness of Dr. King’s activism, I’d like to share a singular example of how this nation’s federal government thanked him for his efforts at peaceful democratic change. The following is from the excellent website “Letters of Note.”
In November of 1964, fearful of his connection to the Communist Partythrough Stanley Levison, the FBI anonymously sent Martin Luther King the following threatening letter, along with a cassette that contained allegedly incriminating audio recordings of King with women in various hotel rooms — the fruits of a 9 month surveillance project headed by William C. Sullivan.Unsurprisingly, King saw the strongly worded letter as an invitation for him to take his own life, as did an official investigation in 1976 which concluded that the letter “clearly implied that suicide would be a suitable course of action for Dr. King.”Transcript follows, free of most redactions.







KING,In view of your low grade… I will not dignify your name with either a Mr. or a Reverend or a Dr. And, your last name calls to mind only the type of King such as King Henry the VIII… King, look into your heart. You know you are a complete fraud and a great liability to all of us Negroes. White people in this country have enough frauds of their own but I am sure they don’t have one at this time anywhere near your equal. You are no clergyman and you know it. I repeat you are a colossal fraud and an evil, vicious one at that. You could not believe in God… Clearly you don’t believe in any personal moral principles. King, like all frauds your end is approaching. You could have been our greatest leader. You, even at an early age have turned out to be not a leader but a dissolute, abnormal moral imbecile. We will now have to depend on our older leaders like Wilkins, a man of character and thank God we have others like him. But you are done. Your “honorary” degrees, your Nobel Prize (what a grim farce) and other awards will not save you. King, I repeat you are done. No person can overcome facts, not even a fraud like yourself… I repeat — no person can argue successfully against facts… Satan could not do more. What incredible evilness… King you are done. The American public, the church organizations that have been helping — Protestant, Catholic and Jews will know you for what you are — an evil, abnormal beast. So will others who have backed you. You are done. King, there is only one thing left for you to do. You know what it is. You have just 34 days in which to do it (this exact number has been selected for a specific reason, it has definite practical significance). You are done. There is but one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy, abnormal fraudulent self is bared to the nation.







Dr. King was not perfect, no man can be; but he was brave and righteous, which few even attempt. Let’s take this moment to remember not only his beautiful vision for the way-the-world-could-be, but also the wretched way the world-as-it-was thanked him for his efforts. 

    Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most important and radical political activists of the 20th century. Not “civil rights figures.” Not “African American leaders.” Not “non-violent reformists.” When I say “radical political activist,” that is exactly what I mean. The scope of his vision for a better world was wide in breadth and deep in root. In his 13 short years of public activism, he (and his many allies) courageously addressed issues of race, class, materialism, war, moral culture, sex, and religion. The medicine Dr. King prescribed for each of these interrelated topics was bitter and centered around a “radical revolution of values“ (video here).

    On this blog, I’ve noted modern culture’s attempt to retroactively “speak for” and water down Dr. King’s truly radical politics several times. This impulse to memorialize and canonize Dr. King and his ideas is so strong, you might think we as a people had actually consummated his vision for a better America. Sadly, I suspect the true reason to be much more banal; that is, we memorialize because “it is easier to build monuments than to make a better world.”

    Well. Today is once again Martin Luther King Jr. Day and I thought I’d use the occasion for a somewhat novel purpose. Instead of focusing on the richness of Dr. King’s activism, I’d like to share a singular example of how this nation’s federal government thanked him for his efforts at peaceful democratic change. The following is from the excellent website “Letters of Note.”

    In November of 1964, fearful of his connection to the Communist Partythrough Stanley Levison, the FBI anonymously sent Martin Luther King the following threatening letter, along with a cassette that contained allegedly incriminating audio recordings of King with women in various hotel rooms — the fruits of a 9 month surveillance project headed by William C. Sullivan.

    Unsurprisingly, King saw the strongly worded letter as an invitation for him to take his own life, as did an official investigation in 1976 which concluded that the letter “clearly implied that suicide would be a suitable course of action for Dr. King.”

    Transcript follows, free of most redactions.

    KING,

    In view of your low grade… I will not dignify your name with either a Mr. or a Reverend or a Dr. And, your last name calls to mind only the type of King such as King Henry the VIII… 

    King, look into your heart. You know you are a complete fraud and a great liability to all of us Negroes. White people in this country have enough frauds of their own but I am sure they don’t have one at this time anywhere near your equal. You are no clergyman and you know it. I repeat you are a colossal fraud and an evil, vicious one at that. You could not believe in God… Clearly you don’t believe in any personal moral principles. 

    King, like all frauds your end is approaching. You could have been our greatest leader. You, even at an early age have turned out to be not a leader but a dissolute, abnormal moral imbecile. We will now have to depend on our older leaders like Wilkins, a man of character and thank God we have others like him. But you are done. Your “honorary” degrees, your Nobel Prize (what a grim farce) and other awards will not save you. King, I repeat you are done. 

    No person can overcome facts, not even a fraud like yourself… I repeat — no person can argue successfully against facts… Satan could not do more. What incredible evilness… King you are done. 

    The American public, the church organizations that have been helping — Protestant, Catholic and Jews will know you for what you are — an evil, abnormal beast. So will others who have backed you. You are done. 

    King, there is only one thing left for you to do. You know what it is. You have just 34 days in which to do it (this exact number has been selected for a specific reason, it has definite practical significance). You are done. There is but one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy, abnormal fraudulent self is bared to the nation.

    Dr. King was not perfect, no man can be; but he was brave and righteous, which few even attempt. Let’s take this moment to remember not only his beautiful vision for the way-the-world-could-be, but also the wretched way the world-as-it-was thanked him for his efforts. 

  2. Hey there internet. I was just informed that I have accidentally purchased TWO tickets to the upcoming ACLU:ENGAGE event at the VERY swank SIX10 downtown. I bought the first ticket on opening day and the second one last week when I was informed that “time was running out.” I am not a clever man.Anywho. I have to give them the name of the other attendee… who doesn’t technically exist because they are a creature of my error and stupidity. Accordingly, I am looking for a date. My IDEAL date is a blind Anne Hathaway with low standards and a weakness for stocky men who eat Mexican food too quickly but, barring that, anyone with a passion for civil liberties and a strong back for sneaking silverware out of the lunch time plenary panel should send me a message ASAP. Even if you don’t come with me, you should still look into attending! Some super cool friends of mine will also be attending!
Oh yeah! I forgot. In addition to a great schedule of panels and workshops, the very funny Aasif Mandvi of Daily Show fame will be speaking. Remember when he embarrassed the entire state of Florida for their instance on continually electing idiots to public office? Good times.Lurve you Ms. Hathaway,Scott KaneWHEN - Saturday, December 1st, 2012WHERE - Venue SIX10 - 610 S Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL

    Hey there internet. 

    I was just informed that I have accidentally purchased TWO tickets to the upcoming ACLU:ENGAGE event at the VERY swank SIX10 downtown. I bought the first ticket on opening day and the second one last week when I was informed that “time was running out.” I am not a clever man.

    Anywho. I have to give them the name of the other attendee… who doesn’t technically exist because they are a creature of my error and stupidity. Accordingly, I am looking for a date. My IDEAL date is a blind Anne Hathaway with low standards and a weakness for stocky men who eat Mexican food too quickly but, barring that, anyone with a passion for civil liberties and a strong back for sneaking silverware out of the lunch time plenary panel should send me a message ASAP. Even if you don’t come with me, you should still look into attending! Some super cool friends of mine will also be attending!


    Oh yeah! I forgot. In addition to a great schedule of panels and workshops, the very funny Aasif Mandvi of Daily Show fame will be speaking. Remember when he embarrassed the entire state of Florida for their instance on continually electing idiots to public office? Good times.

    Lurve you Ms. Hathaway,
    Scott Kane

    WHEN - Saturday, December 1st, 2012
    WHERE - Venue SIX10 - 610 S Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL

  3. I like voting, so I love the “I Voted” stickers. I also like behavioral economics, so I really love that I love the “I Voted” stickers. I especially like it when my expectations for trivial rewards are met, so I did NOT LOVE when I was denied my “I Voted” sticker this morning. Precinct 22 better get its act together by 2014.

    —Yours truly

  4. zoedelaluna:

erosum:

Newark Mayor Cory Booker Responds to a Question about the NJ Marriage Equality Referendum

Booker 2016

Booker / The Basic Tenets of Constitutional Democracy 2016
I really like these guys as a pair. Mayor Booker seems like an upstanding guy and frankly I’m just glad to see tBTofCD finally found someone to run with. zoedelaluna:

erosum:

Newark Mayor Cory Booker Responds to a Question about the NJ Marriage Equality Referendum

Booker 2016

Booker / The Basic Tenets of Constitutional Democracy 2016
I really like these guys as a pair. Mayor Booker seems like an upstanding guy and frankly I’m just glad to see tBTofCD finally found someone to run with. zoedelaluna:

erosum:

Newark Mayor Cory Booker Responds to a Question about the NJ Marriage Equality Referendum

Booker 2016

Booker / The Basic Tenets of Constitutional Democracy 2016
I really like these guys as a pair. Mayor Booker seems like an upstanding guy and frankly I’m just glad to see tBTofCD finally found someone to run with. zoedelaluna:

erosum:

Newark Mayor Cory Booker Responds to a Question about the NJ Marriage Equality Referendum

Booker 2016

Booker / The Basic Tenets of Constitutional Democracy 2016
I really like these guys as a pair. Mayor Booker seems like an upstanding guy and frankly I’m just glad to see tBTofCD finally found someone to run with.

    zoedelaluna:

    erosum:

    Newark Mayor Cory Booker Responds to a Question about the NJ Marriage Equality Referendum

    Booker 2016

    Booker / The Basic Tenets of Constitutional Democracy 2016

    I really like these guys as a pair. Mayor Booker seems like an upstanding guy and frankly I’m just glad to see tBTofCD finally found someone to run with.

  5. lafuguedantoine:

P071511PS-0445 by The White House on Flickr.
Via Flickr: July 15, 2011 “One of the most poignant days of the year was when Ruby Bridges visited the White House. Ruby is the girl portrayed in Norman Rockwell’s famous painting, “The Problem We All Live With,” which depicts Ruby as she is escorted to school on the court-ordered first day of integrated schools in New Orleans in 1960. When the Norman Rockwell Museum loaned the painting to the White House for a short period of time, the President invited Ruby to view the painting while it was on display outside the Oval Office.”  (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

    lafuguedantoine:

    P071511PS-0445 by The White House on Flickr.

    Via Flickr:
    July 15, 2011
    “One of the most poignant days of the year was when Ruby Bridges visited the White House. Ruby is the girl portrayed in Norman Rockwell’s famous painting, “The Problem We All Live With,” which depicts Ruby as she is escorted to school on the court-ordered first day of integrated schools in New Orleans in 1960. When the Norman Rockwell Museum loaned the painting to the White House for a short period of time, the President invited Ruby to view the painting while it was on display outside the Oval Office.”
    (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

  6. Militias Exercise Their Second Amendment Rights To Protect Occupy Phoenix

    In Phoenix, a local “Conservative” militia comes out to protect the Occupy Wall Streetprotesters from police brutality.

    I’m sure this has the Corporate media monopolies running scared, they have been working hard to keep people devided into either the “Liberal” or “Conservative” classification. If people start coming together to stop the corporate power grab despite their torrent of lies and distraction what will they do?

    Only time will tell, but one thing is for sure, this will never get airplay in the mainstream media.

    Wow.

    Love this.

    Strange bedfellows right?

    If you get to the part where the interviewer starts talking about silver and other precious metals… you can probably stop watching.

  7. Five Things You Should Know About Fred Shuttlesworth
When legendary civil rights activist Reverend Fred L. Shuttlesworth died today, many Americans had no idea who he was or what he’d accomplished in his 89 years on earth. It’s an unfortunate reality that people often think Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were the beginning and end of black activism in the Civil Rights era. In fact, nothing could be more wrong. From the 1950s onward, Shuttlesworth was a major factor in ending Jim Crow laws in the South, and many other oppressive forces throughout the United States. Here are the top five things you should know about him.
1. From the start of his career, Shuttlesworth, who was raised poor in Alabama, was fiery and obstinate. After Alabama officially banned the NAACP from operating within the state in 1956, Shuttlesworth, then a pastor, founded the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights. The ACMHR’s first major order of business was a Birmingham bus sit-in, during which Shuttlesworth and others boarded city buses and sat in the “whites only” sections. The ACMHR would eventually become charter member organization in the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.
2. He lived nearly nine decades, but many people tried to kill Shuttlesworth much earlier for his outspokenness. He was the target of two bomb attacks, one on his home and one on his church. And when Shuttlesworth tried to enroll his daughters in an all-white Birmingham school in 1957, an armed mob attacked him, beating him unconscious and stabbing his wife. The couple survived, and when a doctor remarked that Shuttlesworth was lucky to have avoided a concussion,Shuttlesworth said, “Doctor, the Lord knew I lived in a hard town, so he gave me a hard head.”
3. Though he worked closely with King, Shuttlesworth’s style was decidedly different. “Among the youthful ‘elders’ of the movement,” historian Diane McWhorter told The New York Times, “he was Martin Luther King’s most effective and insistent foil: blunt where King was soothing, driven where King was leisurely, and most important, confrontational where King was conciliatory—meaning, critically, that he was more upsetting than King in the eyes of the white public.” Despite their differences, King once called Shuttlesworth ”the most courageous civil rights fighter in the South.”
4. Shuttlesworth’s fiercest enemy in Birmingham was infamous public safety commissioner Bull Connor. Connor’s violent responses—attack dogs, fire hoses, billy clubs—to Shuttlesworth’s peaceful demonstrations were integral in changing America’s attitude about Jim Crow. “The televised images of Connor directing handlers of police dogs to attack unarmed demonstrators and firefighters’ using hoses to knock down children had a profound effect on American citizens’ view of the civil rights struggle,” says the Shuttlesworth Foundation’s website.
5. After his actions helped spawn the passage of the federal Civil Rights Act in 1964, Shuttlesworth continued fighting for justice in realms both racial and economic. In 1988 he founded the Shuttlesworth Housing Foundation to help low-income families own their own homes, and in 2004 he became president of the SCLC. A firebrand to the end, he resigned from the SCLC within months, saying “deceit, mistrust and a lack of spiritual discipline and truth have eaten at the core of this once-hallowed organization.” Three years ago, the city of Birmingham named its airport after Shuttlesworth. There are still no monuments named after Bull Connor.

    Five Things You Should Know About Fred Shuttlesworth

    When legendary civil rights activist Reverend Fred L. Shuttlesworth died today, many Americans had no idea who he was or what he’d accomplished in his 89 years on earth. It’s an unfortunate reality that people often think Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were the beginning and end of black activism in the Civil Rights era. In fact, nothing could be more wrong. From the 1950s onward, Shuttlesworth was a major factor in ending Jim Crow laws in the South, and many other oppressive forces throughout the United States. Here are the top five things you should know about him.

    1. From the start of his career, Shuttlesworth, who was raised poor in Alabama, was fiery and obstinate. After Alabama officially banned the NAACP from operating within the state in 1956, Shuttlesworth, then a pastor, founded the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights. The ACMHR’s first major order of business was a Birmingham bus sit-in, during which Shuttlesworth and others boarded city buses and sat in the “whites only” sections. The ACMHR would eventually become charter member organization in the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

    2. He lived nearly nine decades, but many people tried to kill Shuttlesworth much earlier for his outspokenness. He was the target of two bomb attacks, one on his home and one on his church. And when Shuttlesworth tried to enroll his daughters in an all-white Birmingham school in 1957, an armed mob attacked him, beating him unconscious and stabbing his wife. The couple survived, and when a doctor remarked that Shuttlesworth was lucky to have avoided a concussion,Shuttlesworth said, “Doctor, the Lord knew I lived in a hard town, so he gave me a hard head.”

    3. Though he worked closely with King, Shuttlesworth’s style was decidedly different. “Among the youthful ‘elders’ of the movement,” historian Diane McWhorter told The New York Times, “he was Martin Luther King’s most effective and insistent foil: blunt where King was soothing, driven where King was leisurely, and most important, confrontational where King was conciliatory—meaning, critically, that he was more upsetting than King in the eyes of the white public.” Despite their differences, King once called Shuttlesworth ”the most courageous civil rights fighter in the South.”

    4. Shuttlesworth’s fiercest enemy in Birmingham was infamous public safety commissioner Bull Connor. Connor’s violent responses—attack dogs, fire hoses, billy clubs—to Shuttlesworth’s peaceful demonstrations were integral in changing America’s attitude about Jim Crow. “The televised images of Connor directing handlers of police dogs to attack unarmed demonstrators and firefighters’ using hoses to knock down children had a profound effect on American citizens’ view of the civil rights struggle,” says the Shuttlesworth Foundation’s website.

    5. After his actions helped spawn the passage of the federal Civil Rights Act in 1964, Shuttlesworth continued fighting for justice in realms both racial and economic. In 1988 he founded the Shuttlesworth Housing Foundation to help low-income families own their own homes, and in 2004 he became president of the SCLC. A firebrand to the end, he resigned from the SCLC within months, saying “deceit, mistrust and a lack of spiritual discipline and truth have eaten at the core of this once-hallowed organization.” Three years ago, the city of Birmingham named its airport after Shuttlesworth. There are still no monuments named after Bull Connor.

  8. The most recent liberty-abridging, Terrorism-justified controversies have focused on diluting the legal rights of American citizens (in part because the rights of non-citizens are largely gone already and there are none left to attack).  A bipartisan group from Congress sponsors legislation to strip Americans of their citizenship based on Terrorism accusations.  Barack Obama claims the right to assassinate Americans far from any battlefield and with no due process of any kind.  The Obama administration begins covertly abandoning long-standing Mirandaprotections for American suspects by vastly expanding what had long been a very narrow “public safety” exception, and now Eric Holderexplicitly advocates legislation to codify that erosion.  John McCain and Joe Lieberman introduce legislation to bar all Terrorism suspects, including Americans arrested on U.S. soil, from being tried in civilian courts, and former Bush officials Bill Burck and Dana Perino — while noting (correctly) that Holder’s Miranda proposal constitutes a concession to the right-wing claim that Miranda is too restrictive —today demand that U.S. citizens accused of Terrorism and arrested on U.S. soil be treated as enemy combatants and thus denied even the most basic legal protections (including the right to be charged and have access to a lawyer).

    It is not hyperbole to observe that all of the above-cited recent examples are designed to formally exempt a certain class of American citizens — those accused of being Terrorists and arrested on U.S. soil — from the most basic legal protections.  They’re all intended, in the name of Scary Terrorists, to rewrite the core rules of our justice system in order to increase the already-vast detention powers of the U.S. Government and further minimize the remaining safeguards against abuse.  The most disgraceful episodes in American history have been about exempting classes of Americans from core rights, and that is exactly what these recent, Terrorism-justified proposals do as well.  Anyone who believes that these sorts of abusive powers will be exercised only in narrow and magnanimous ways should just read a little bit of history, or just look at what has happened with the always-expanding police powers vested in the name of the never-ending War on Drugs, the precursor to the never-ending War on Terrorism in so many ways.

    It really is the case that every new Terrorist incident reflexively produces a single-minded focus on one question:   which rights should we take away now/which new powers should we give the Government?

  9. Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny”

    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”

    “Fuck the fear mongering shitheads who said all that shit in the previous post and the cowardly fucks who swallow it.

    Aeschylus, Mark Twain and ataxiwardance respectively

"you suggest the struggle goes both ways but baby, I don't even ask"

Real Time Web Analytics