1. 
Earlier today, I watched this video. I find the fellow and his tone rather obnoxious but he brought some new and important information to light on a topic of critical importance to everyone. I figured I could try to extract this fellow’s important points and summarize them in the context of media consolidation as best I can:
Some Well Known History
Since the early 80s there has been a massive consolidation of media companies. 
There are currently six large media corporations which effectively control all American media. 
A globalized information economy, Western cultural imperialism, and overseas media purchasing have lead to these same six companies to have effective control of much of the world’s media as well.
These few remaining media conglomerates are one of the most powerful and successful lobbying groups in the United States. 
This process of ever greater media consolidation and lecherous government lobbying is closely analogous to the banking industry. 
For an excellent summary on media consolidation its effect on what YOU understand about the world you live in and YOUR government, I strongly recommend frugaldad’s excellent infographic on the topic.
Some Less Well Known History
During the first decade of the 21st century a myriad of P2P file-sharing software was developed, distributed and widely used across the net. Examples of this software would be Kazaa, LimeWire, BitTorrent etc. While it is entirely possible to use this software for completely legal purposes, it was widely used as a means to pirate media. ESPECIALLY music. 
During this same time period this same software was actually promoted and distributed to the general public by these same six media giants for a great profit. When I say great profit, I mean like hundreds of millions of dollars in advertising and promotional revenue. These media companies specifically taught and encouraged its customers to use this software to pirate music that was knowingly protected under US IP law.
The same media giants that were making enormous fortunes by promoting piracy-software were simultaneously suing grandmothers, college students, and single moms for using them.
The Present and A Disturbing Look Into the Future
These six corporations (and hundreds more of corporate interests) are currently pouring millions of dollars into lobbying for both the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect IP Act (PIPA). These lobbyists and media corporations point to online piracy as the reason for this legislation.
However both pieces of legislation at hand (SOPA and PIPA) would be largely INEFFECTIVE at actually stopping piracy of any kind. 
What SOPA and PIPA WOULD DO is allow large media corporations to shield themselves from competition, cripple start up businesses, exercise effective censorship over the internet, and destroy social media websites. Yes. This includes Tumblr, youtube, reddit, and all your other favorite websites.
Don’t worry non-Americans! The United States federal government has made it clear that should you offend the sensibilities of these media corporations or our laws, your website will look like this and you will be subject to extradition to the United States to stand trial for your heinous crimes.
There has been some lobbying push-back against SOPA and PIPA. This has largely been from the Electronic Freedom Foundation, Silicon Valley, and grass roots free-information organizations. I like to call these groups “people who know what they’re talking about”. Unfortunately the amount of money be spent lobbying doesn’t really compare. 
One sentence summary:
The same six media conglomerates that brought the tools of piracy to the internet are now using piracy as a false pretext to monopolize their corporate stranglehold on media, censor the internet and perpetually insulate themselves from competition.
(art by Eric Drooker, website here)

    Earlier today, I watched this video. I find the fellow and his tone rather obnoxious but he brought some new and important information to light on a topic of critical importance to everyone. I figured I could try to extract this fellow’s important points and summarize them in the context of media consolidation as best I can:

    Some Well Known History

    Some Less Well Known History

    The Present and A Disturbing Look Into the Future

    One sentence summary:

    The same six media conglomerates that brought the tools of piracy to the internet are now using piracy as a false pretext to monopolize their corporate stranglehold on media, censor the internet and perpetually insulate themselves from competition.

    (art by Eric Drooker, website here)

  2. kohenari:


We get it. You think you can be cute and old-fashioned by openly admitting that you don’t know what a DNS server is. You relish the opportunity to put on a half-cocked smile and ask to skip over the techno-jargon, conveniently masking your ignorance by making yourselves seem better aligned with the average American joe or jane — the “non-nerds” among us. But to anyone of moderate intelligence that tuned in to yesterday’s Congressional mark-up of SOPA, the legislation that seeks to fundamentally change how the internet works, you kind of just looked like a bunch of jack-asses.
[…]
This used to be funny, but now it’s really just terrifying. We’re dealing with legislation that will completely change the face of the internet and free speech for years to come. Yet here we are, still at the mercy of underachieving Congressional know-nothings that have more in common with the slacker students sitting in the back of math class than elected representatives. The fact that some of the people charged with representing us must be dragged kicking and screaming out of their complacency on such matters is no longer endearing — it’s just pathetic and sad.

(via ShortFormBlog).

    kohenari:

    We get it. You think you can be cute and old-fashioned by openly admitting that you don’t know what a DNS server is. You relish the opportunity to put on a half-cocked smile and ask to skip over the techno-jargon, conveniently masking your ignorance by making yourselves seem better aligned with the average American joe or jane — the “non-nerds” among us. But to anyone of moderate intelligence that tuned in to yesterday’s Congressional mark-up of SOPA, the legislation that seeks to fundamentally change how the internet works, you kind of just looked like a bunch of jack-asses.

    […]

    This used to be funny, but now it’s really just terrifying. We’re dealing with legislation that will completely change the face of the internet and free speech for years to come. Yet here we are, still at the mercy of underachieving Congressional know-nothings that have more in common with the slacker students sitting in the back of math class than elected representatives. The fact that some of the people charged with representing us must be dragged kicking and screaming out of their complacency on such matters is no longer endearing — it’s just pathetic and sad.

    (via ShortFormBlog).

  3. When the Chinese told Google that they had to block sites or they couldn’t do [business] in their country, they managed to figure out how to block sites.

    —Chris Dodd, former Democratic Senator from Connecticut and current head of the MPAA lobby. To be clear he is invoking the Great Chinese Firewall as a reason SOPA is a feasible and good idea.

  4. gonzodave:

    Good for Google. I suggest these illegal requests are desperate attempts to mitigate the coming civil and criminal litigation that will be levied against municipal workers (read: irresponsible, badged, public sector workers with guns) who are liable.

    self-ownership:

    According to Google:

    We received a request from a local law enforcement agency to remove YouTube videos of police brutality, which we did not remove. Separately, we received requests from a different local law enforcement agency for removal of videos allegedly defaming law enforcement officials. We did not comply with those requests, which we have categorized in this Report as defamation requests.

    Reasons for content removal from those who serve to “protect” us include defamation, privacy and security, national security, government criticism, and violence (more than likely initiated on their behalf).

    If they’re here to “protect” us, what could they possibly have to hide?

  5. Censorship is telling a man he can’t have a steak just because a baby can’t chew it.

    —unknown, often erroneously attributed to Mark Twain

"you suggest the struggle goes both ways but baby, I don't even ask"

Real Time Web Analytics