-
Yeah, you’ve probably never heard of it.
LOLLLL
LTMC: .1% of the world gets this joke. I am ashamed to say that I am not only part of that .1%, but was wracked verily with hearty guffaws.
We. Are. The point one percent!
Apparently as a matter of English feudal tradition, following the ”livery of seisin” ceremony the children of the grantor / grantee were beaten to ensure that they would remember the occasion.
ENGLAND! FUCK YEAH!
28 April, 2012
Sourced from lawschoolmemes
Originally from lawschoolmemes
Reblogged from letterstomycountry
Tagged as England Property law law school
Notes (48) -
Watch the complete series “Philosophy - A Guide to Happiness” here:
Episodes:
1. Socrates on Self-Confidence.
2. Epicurus on Happiness.
3. Seneca on Anger.
4. Montaigne on Self-Esteem.
5. Schopenhauer on Love.
6. Nietzsche on Hardship.
But but but… I have Crim Law reading to do…
28 February, 2012
Sourced from thecultofgenius
Reblogged from thecultofgenius
Tagged as Law school philosophy happiness video art
Notes (123) -
Hey guys, check it out. It’s my to-do list for this week.
I think I’m a little over committed this semester.
O_O
-
Interactive: Explore upcoming U.S. Supreme Court cases
Love this!
21 February, 2012
Sourced from reuters
Originally from reuters
Reblogged from kohenari
Tagged as jurisprudence Supreme Court United States Supreme Court law school
Notes (176) -
squashed replied to your post: Personal Notes: On Reading Cases
And when it’s a Thomas opinion, I close the book. Because Thomas’s opinions are written terribly. Scalia was at least witty.
Thomas is horrible 99% of the time. But he is actually fairly lucid when he’s writing…I’m not going to address Affirmative Action on the whole as theory or practice but I am sympathetic to your unease in finding yourself nodding along to Justice Thomas. I had the similar and unfortunate experience last week while reviewing my Con Law readings. His Grutter dissent is actually a stirring revival of the important and beautiful colorblind interpretation the Equal Protection Clause as well as a reality check on how lax the Court can be with the second prong of the Strict Scrutiny inquiry. I admit, I felt fairly strange telling a friend after class that I was both the President of my law school’s ACLU and (temporarily) in agreeance with Justice Thomas.
Shudder.
Thankfully this sympathy for the (originalist) devil(s) didn’t last too long. This morning I draw caricatures of Scalia sobbing like a baby in the margins of his particularly histrionic United States v. Virginia (1996) dissent. D: < Scalia
Anywho, relevant news is relevant: New York Times - Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Affirmative Action Case
21 February, 2012
Sourced from letterstomycountry
Reblogged from letterstomycountry
Tagged as Affirmative Action Antonin Scalia Clarence Thomas supreme court law school jurisprudence
Notes (10) -
Spring Semester Classes I do not understand at all:
- Criminal Law
- Legal Writing
- Legislation
- Property
- Constitutional Law (Half)
Spring Semester Classes I partially understand:
- Constitutional Law (Half)
Spring Semester Classes I understand completely:
- [Null Set]
Sigh.
-
Truth.
-
GPOYW-Law-School-Makes-Me-Dress-Like-A-Grandpa Edition
Going to go for a run and try to rinse the taste of stupid left in my brain from reading this earlier.
Can’t wait to visit NYC this weekend.
-
FAME. MONEY. PUBLIC SERVICE.
-
I anxiously waited until I got home to check them.
Took a double shot of Noah’s Mill bourbon as I clicked to open them.
Sigh.
With grades, like the dentist, I really am a baby.
